Research Network
Directory pending releaseResearch network directory pending release · expert review requests can still be filed
HaiWen does not present AI output as final legal advice. The research network directory is currently pending release: we are seeking each scholar’s own written confirmation, and no personal information is shown here until it is given. Complex matters can still be filed as expert review requests with a clear scope, materials and deliverables; whether a request is taken on is confirmed case by case.
The research network directory is not published yet
Every member of the directory is a real, serving academic. Appearing on an academic community roster is not consent to be displayed on this commercial platform or presented as a platform consultant. We have therefore moved the entire directory to “pending release” while we seek each person’s written confirmation.
Until that confirmation is given, this site shows no names, affiliations, research focus or profile pages. Members go live one at a time, as each confirmation arrives.
The directory is sourced from the “GCIEC community roster”. If you are one of the scholars listed and would like to confirm public listing, correct your information, or be removed permanently, please tell us via the contact page and we will act promptly.
Human review brief specifications
The items below are HaiWen HQ platform-side specifications for review briefs (scope and applicable cases) to help you frame the question and prepare materials. They carry no turnaround commitment.
Note: These are service specifications, not services delivered by the scholars in the research network directory. The actual reviewer is determined case by case, and any involvement of a network member requires that person’s written confirmation.
The scopes below describe what an expert review can cover — they are not instantly purchasable services. Complex matters can be filed as expert review requests; availability, the reviewer and the timeline are confirmed case by case, and the platform makes no commitment on an expert’s behalf.
EU AI and data compliance review
EU AI Act risk classification, GDPR DPIA, SCC transfer and customer DPA appendix.
Before EU enterprise customer POC
AI enterprise ESG disclosure review
Compute carbon methodology, fairness disclosure, supplier responsibility and due-diligence questionnaires.
Before customer or investor submission
U.S. export control and customer security review
Model capability, chips/cloud resources, sanctions screening and sector customer security appendix.
Before U.S. commercialization
How to request expert review
File an expert review request in the workspace with the issue, materials, expected deliverables and confidentiality requirements, then track its status there; whether a request is taken on is confirmed case by case.