Skip to content
TRUST CENTER

Trust is not a statement —it is a set of verifiable controls

A commercial compliance product must answer four questions: where do outputs come from, how is enterprise data isolated, how are reports reviewed, and which conclusions cannot replace professional advice? This page marks each item as a control mapping, a target or a sample.

Framework mapping

Framework control mapping and target status

These entries are internal control mappings or targets, not certifications, attestations or legal conclusions; independent certification status is NOT VERIFIED.

GDPR
EU
Control mapping
PIPL
China
Control mapping
CCPA / CPRA
US
Control mapping
PDPA
Singapore
Control mapping
ISO 27001
Global
Target
SOC 2 Type II
Global
Target
ISO 42001 (AIMS)
Global
Target
WCAG 2.1 AA
Global
Target
Four trust controls

From source to audit — controls embedded in product workflow

01

Traceable sources

AI answers draw first on the platform’s policy, case and regulatory-update corpus, and cite sources when they exist.

02

Enterprise data isolation

Profiles, reports, saved items and projects are isolated per organization (row-level security), with admin, compliance editor, ESG lead and read-only roles.

03

Human-review boundary

Complex legal, tax and certification matters are flagged for human review and can be filed as expert review requests (confirmed case by case); AI output is never presented as legal advice.

04

Responsible compliance disclaimer

The platform supports decisions and materials; it does not replace licensed counsel or auditors.

AI transparency

Citation capability and limits

Models & providers

The code supports configurable reasoning and embedding providers; the providers currently used in production are listed in Annex III of the Data Processing Agreement. Each provider’s region and supplier data terms require deployment and contract confirmation (NOT VERIFIED).

Knowledge sources

Some workflows can retrieve from the knowledge base. Coverage, source licensing and production sync cadence require operational evidence (NOT VERIFIED).

Citations & limits

Multi-Tool Agent Advisor outputs can include citations when tool results provide provenance; Enhanced RAG Q&A cites retrieved sources, and source-free results may be uncited. High-risk outputs require human review and must not be treated as professional conclusions.

Data isolation

Authenticated chats may be persisted as part of the product. Retention, provider training use and private deployment depend on actual configuration and signed contracts and are not independently verified (NOT VERIFIED).

Auditable artifacts

Availability depends on generated and approved evidence

AI output boundary statement

States that AI answers support decisions only and complex legal, tax, certification and filing issues require human review.

Data isolation and access-control note

Explains workspace isolation, member roles, server-side keys and audit-log boundaries.

Policy source and update mechanism

Records sources, update cadence and citation rules for the Policy & Standards Library, the Case Library and regulatory updates.

Expert review scope and delivery boundary

Defines the scope, inputs, deliverables and confidentiality of a human review; availability and timing are confirmed case by case.

Report Quality Checks (sample)

Checks we recommend before a report goes outSample

Report quality checks (sample): these items describe what a report review looks at; the states shown are samples, not the result of a check run on any specific report.

Complete source references

Key conclusions are tied to policy, case or regulatory-update sources so customers and reviewers can check them.

SAMPLE · PASS
Owners and deadlines set

Every remediation item has an owner role, priority, deadline and evidence requirement.

SAMPLE · PASS
High-risk items flagged for review

Legal, tax, certification and filing conclusions are not treated as final professional advice.

SAMPLE · PASS
!
ESG data methodology sign-off

Compute carbon and fairness metrics still need finance, security and ESG owner confirmation.

SAMPLE · OPEN
Audit trail sample

An example log of actions, decisions and outputs

Updated EU AI system risk classification

Compliance lead · Assessment report r001 · Today 10:30

Uploaded compute-carbon estimate

ESG lead · Evidence register · ESG · Yesterday 16:20

Flagged SCC appendix for legal review

Legal lead · Due diligence response pack · Monday

Legal scope & disclaimer

HaiWen HQ supports decisions — it does not replace professional advice

  • Before any external disclosure, customer commitment or regulatory filing, key conclusions should be reviewed by licensed counsel / auditors / certification bodies.
  • The platform does not accept advisory requests involving sanctioned entities, weapons proliferation, child exploitation or other unacceptable uses.
  • The platform's publicly stated KB sync time governs; fast-moving areas always require human review.
Privacy Policy
↗
Terms of Service
↗
Data Processing Agreement (DPA)
↗
AI Transparency Whitepaper
In preparation
Accessibility Statement (WCAG 2.1 AA)
In preparation
Security Controls Matrix
In preparation
GDPR · PIPL · CCPA control mapping
Traceable AI · cited when sourced
ISO 27001 alignment in progress
WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility target
Trust Center | HaiWen HQ