Skip to content
Back to policy library
European UnionIn forceRelevance to Chinese AI firms: MediumCross-border dataData & privacy

EU Data Governance Act

Regulation (EU) 2022/868 on European data governance and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (Data Governance Act)

European Parliament and Council of the European Union · Regulation (EU) 2022/868

Establishes a trusted intermediation and governance framework for data sharing in the EU. It has three pillars: conditions for the re-use of protected data held by public sector bodies; a notification regime and conditions for providing data intermediation services (Arts. 10 to 12); and a voluntary registration regime for data altruism organisations. Most directly relevant to AI companies are the three categories of data intermediation service defined in Art. 10: intermediation between data holders and potential data users, including providing the technical or other means to enable it, which may include bilateral or multilateral data exchanges, creation of platforms or databases enabling exchange or joint use of data, and establishment of other specific infrastructure interconnecting data holders with data users; intermediation between data subjects, or natural persons seeking to make non-personal data available, and potential data users, in particular enabling the exercise of GDPR rights; and data cooperative services. Such services must be notified and must meet the structural conditions in Art. 12, the most binding of which are that the data must not be used for purposes other than putting it at the disposal of data users, and that the service must be provided through a separate legal person.

Verified against official sources · 2026-09-12Partly secondary sources — verify before relying

Does this apply to me?

Triggering business actions: a Chinese company operating in the EU a data marketplace, a data exchange platform, a matchmaking platform for joint modelling or federated learning, a marketplace for training datasets, or a service helping individuals pool consent for their data to be used in AI training. Art. 11(3) is explicit: a provider not established in the Union that offers the Art. 10 services in the Union must designate a legal representative in one of the Member States where the services are offered and is deemed to fall under that Member State’s jurisdiction. Conversely, a company that uses data for its own products and model training rather than intermediating flows between third parties is generally not a data intermediation services provider, and that is the decisive dividing line.

Key industries: Enterprise SaaS, GenAI & foundation models, Healthcare AI, AI agents

Application timeline

  1. 2022-06-23

    Regulation enters into force

    Enters into force on the twentieth day following publication; obligations apply from 24 Sep 2023.

  2. 2023-09-24

    Regulation becomes applicable

    The notification regime for data intermediation services, the conditions for providing such services, and the data altruism regime become fully applicable.

Obligations (3)

Each states its trigger, the evidence to retain and the clause it comes from

Prior notification of data intermediation services

Severity HighArt. 10, Art. 11(1)-(6)

A provider intending to offer the data intermediation services listed in Art. 10 must submit a notification to the competent authority for data intermediation services. After notifying, it may start the activity subject to the conditions of that chapter, and the notification entitles it to provide data intermediation services in all Member States. A provider with establishments in more than one Member State is deemed to fall under the jurisdiction of the Member State of its main establishment. The notification must contain the information listed in Art. 11(6), beginning with the provider’s name.

Applies when
Chinese companies operating data trading or matchmaking platforms in the EU. Note that notification is an ex ante step, not an after-the-fact filing: starting the service without notifying is itself an infringement.
Deadline: Notification must be submitted before starting to provide the service.
Applies from: 2023-09-24
Evidence to retain
  • · Notification submission and the competent authority acknowledgement
  • · Mapping of the service offering to the three Art. 10 categories
  • · Screenshot of the entry in the public register

Estimated first-time effort: 5–15 person-days (estimate, not a commitment)

Structural and conduct conditions for data intermediation services

Severity HighArt. 12

Providing the Art. 10 services is subject to the conditions in Art. 12, of which the structural requirements matter most: the provider must not use the data for which it provides intermediation services for purposes other than putting it at the disposal of data users, and must provide the service through a separate legal person; the commercial terms including pricing for providing the service to a data holder or data user must not depend on whether, or to what degree, that party uses other services provided by the same provider or a related entity; and data collected on any activity of a natural or legal person for the purpose of providing the service, including date, time and geolocation data, duration of activity, and connections established with other persons, may be used only to develop that intermediation service, which may entail use for fraud detection or cybersecurity, and must be made available to the data holders on request.

Applies when
Chinese companies providing data matchmaking in the EU. The sharpest constraints are the separate-legal-person and no-own-use rules: putting the data exchange and the company’s own model training in one entity, or training in-house models on data flowing through the platform, breaches this Article outright.
Applies from: 2023-09-24
Evidence to retain
  • · Incorporation documents of the separate legal person and a description of business separation
  • · Technical and organisational controls enforcing the data use restriction
  • · Pricing policy and compliance review evidencing no tying
  • · Records of the use restriction on activity data and of responses to data holder requests for it

Estimated first-time effort: 10–30 person-days (estimate, not a commitment)

Penalties

Penalties are set by Member States and must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. In addition, competent authorities may require a data intermediation services provider to cease an infringement and, where it fails to meet the Art. 12 conditions within a reasonable period, order it to stop providing the data intermediation service, with removal from the public register. For a business whose core activity is data matchmaking, a cessation order usually bites harder than a fine.

Known uncertainty

Confidence is medium because whether an AI data platform is a "data intermediation service" within Art. 10 leaves real interpretive room, especially for hybrid models that both use data internally and intermediate third-party data, and national competent authorities have not converged on a single reading. Penalties are also legislated Member State by Member State and are not verified country by country here. Companies should obtain confirmation from the competent authority of the relevant Member State for their specific model before launching data trading or joint-modelling matchmaking in the EU.

Sources (1)

Content as of 2026-09-12 · corpus 2026.09|Compiled from public official sources with links and review dates for compliance decision support. Rules change; have licensed professionals review before external disclosure, regulatory filing or contractual commitments.

Related regulations

GDPR · PIPL · CCPA control mapping
Traceable AI · cited when sourced
ISO 27001 alignment in progress
WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility target
EU Data Governance Act · Obligations & official sources | HaiWen HQ