Skip to content
Back to policy library
European UnionPhased applicationRelevance to Chinese AI firms: CriticalSector-specificAI regulationCybersecurity

EU Machinery Regulation

Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 on machinery and repealing Directive 2006/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 73/361/EEC

European Parliament and Council of the EU · Regulation (EU) 2023/1230

The Machinery Regulation replaces the Machinery Directive and writes digital risks — self-evolving behaviour, autonomy, data dependency — into the essential health and safety requirements. For the first time it lists safety components with fully or partially self-evolving behaviour using machine learning that ensure safety functions (and machinery embedding such systems) in Annex I Part A, making third-party conformity assessment mandatory. Technical documentation must be kept for 10 years and source code or programming logic must be produced on a reasoned request; anyone carrying out a substantial modification is treated as the manufacturer.

Verified against official sources · 2026-09-12Verified against official text

Does this apply to me?

A Chinese company is in scope as soon as it places machinery or a "related product" on the EU market or puts it into service in the EU. Typical triggers: shipping industrial robots, cobots, AGV/AMR fleets, robot cells or end-effectors to EU customers; supplying vision or force-control safety components, safety PLCs or safety-related software that perform a safety function; embedding a self-evolving motion-control or obstacle-avoidance model as a safety component in machines sold into the EU; retrofitting or upgrading machinery already placed on the EU market, which may amount to a substantial modification under Article 18 and pull the full manufacturer obligations onto the modifier. Products made in China and never entering the EU market are out of scope.

Key industries: Embodied AI & robotics, AI hardware & compute, Computer vision

Application timeline

  1. 2023-07-19

    Regulation enters into force (twentieth day after OJ publication)

    Entry into force alone imposes no product obligations; under Article 54(c) as corrected, Article 6(7), Article 48 and Article 52 apply from the same day, 19 July 2023. The original OJ text read 13 July 2023 and was changed to 19 July 2023 by the corrigendum at OJ L 169, 4.7.2023.

  2. 2024-01-20

    Notified body provisions start to apply

    Articles 26 to 42 apply, so Member States can designate and notify bodies under the new Regulation and manufacturers can book third-party conformity assessment capacity. The date is Article 54(a) as corrected (the original text read 14 January 2024).

  3. 2024-07-20

    The Annex I list-adjustment mechanism in Article 6 and the delegated-act provisions start to apply

    Under Article 54(d) as corrected, Article 6(2) to (6), (8) and (11) and Articles 47 and 53(3) apply from that date, enabling the Commission to add to or remove from the Annex I categories by delegated act — so the Annex I Part A list containing self-evolving machine-learning safety components is itself mutable.

  4. 2026-07-27

    Digital Omnibus enters into force: the Machinery Regulation moves from AI Act Annex I Section A to Section B, and AI requirements are migrated into it

    Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI, adopted 8 July 2026, OJ L 1744, 24.7.2026, in force on the third day after publication) amends both the AI Act and the Machinery Regulation. (1) Under Article 2(2) of the consolidated AI Act, for AI systems classified as high-risk under Article 6(1) by reference to Annex I Section B legislation, only Article 6(1), Article 60a and Articles 102 to 112 apply; the full Chapter III high-risk regime no longer stacks on machinery products. (2) This is not pure deregulation: the new third paragraph of Machinery Regulation Article 8 requires the Commission to add, by delegated act, health and safety requirements to Annex III reflecting AI Act Chapter III Section 2 and Articles 17, 19, 72 and 73, and those delegated acts must apply by 2 August 2028; the new Article 20(10) provides that, until harmonised standards or common specifications are referenced for high-risk AI systems, compliance with the AI Act Article 40/41 harmonised standards or common specifications gives a presumption of conformity with Annex III.

  5. 2026-10-20

    Member States must notify their penalty rules to the Commission; Article 50(1) applies from the same day

    Article 50(2) requires Member States to notify penalty rules and implementing measures by this date, and Article 54(b) as corrected makes Article 50(1) apply from the same day; national penalty levels become visible around it. The date follows the corrected text (the original read 14 October 2026 in Article 50(2) and 14 October 2023 in Article 54(b)).

  6. 2027-01-20

    Machinery Regulation applies in full; Directive 2006/42/EC is repealed

    Machinery, related products and partly completed machinery placed on the market or put into service from that date must comply with this Regulation; Article 52(1) lets products lawfully placed on the market under Directive 2006/42/EC before that date continue to be made available, and Article 52(2) keeps EC type-examination certificates and approval decisions issued under Article 12 of that Directive valid until they expire. The date is Article 54 and Article 51(2) as corrected (the original text read 14 January 2027 in both).

  7. 2028-08-02

    Latest date by which the delegated acts adding AI health and safety requirements to Annex III must apply

    The third paragraph of Machinery Regulation Article 8 provides that the delegated acts reflecting AI Act Chapter III Section 2 and Articles 17, 19, 72 and 73 "shall apply by 2 August 2028". As at this review (12 September 2026) no such delegated act has been adopted, so until that date Annex III contains no AI-specific requirements; treat the date as the second milestone for the documentation system of machinery AI safety components, not as evidence that the AI requirements were permanently removed.

Obligations (7)

Each states its trigger, the evidence to retain and the clause it comes from

Carry out Annex III risk assessment and risk reduction covering foreseeable self-evolving behaviour

Severity CriticalAnnex III;Art. 10(1)

Complete risk assessment and risk reduction at design and construction stage. Beyond conventional mechanical hazards it must cover lifecycle hazards that are foreseeable at the time of placing on the market as an intended evolution of fully or partially self-evolving behaviour or logic, and risks arising from interactions between machines arranged to function as an integral whole. The human-machine interface must be adapted to the foreseeable characteristics of operators and the machine must communicate its planned actions in a comprehensible manner.

Applies when
All manufacturers placing machinery or related products on the EU market or putting them into service, and anyone treated as manufacturer under Article 18 for substantial modifications.
Applies from: 2027-01-20
Evidence to retain
  • · Risk assessment report with hazard list, risk matrix and residual risk statement
  • · Documented boundaries and limiting measures for the intended evolution of self-evolving or autonomous functions
  • · Definition of machine-to-machine interactions and of the assembly boundary
  • · Human-machine interface design rationale showing adaptation to operator characteristics
  • · Verification and validation test records for the risk reduction measures

Estimated first-time effort: 20–60 person-days (estimate, not a commitment)

Mandatory third-party conformity assessment for self-evolving machine-learning safety components

Severity CriticalAnnex I Part A, items 5–6;Art. 25(1)–(2)

Items 5 and 6 of Annex I Part A — safety components with fully or partially self-evolving behaviour using machine learning that ensure safety functions, and machinery embedding such systems that have not been placed independently on the market, in respect only of those systems — cannot be self-declared. One of the three Article 25(2) procedures must be used: module B EU type-examination plus module C, module H full quality assurance, or module G unit verification.

Applies when
Manufacturers of robots, AGV/AMR and cobots, and suppliers of safety components, where a safety function (emergency stop, safe limited speed, safe monitored stop, personnel detection) is implemented or co-implemented by a machine-learning model. Where the safety component was already placed independently on the market with third-party assessment, the machine need not be re-certified merely because it embeds that system.
Applies from: 2027-01-20
Evidence to retain
  • · Inventory of safety functions and the documented determination of whether machine-learning self-evolving behaviour is used
  • · Rationale for the conformity assessment module chosen and record of notified body selection
  • · EU type-examination certificate (module B), approved full quality assurance system (module H) or unit verification certificate (module G)
  • · Notified body findings and closure records

Estimated first-time effort: 40–120 person-days (estimate, not a commitment)

Draw up Annex IV technical documentation, keep it 10 years and produce source code or programming logic on request

Severity HighArt. 10(2)–(3);Annex IV Part A

Draw up the technical documentation set out in Annex IV Part A before placing on the market. Technical documentation and the EU declaration of conformity must be available to market surveillance authorities for at least 10 years from placing on the market or putting into service. Where the source code or programming logic contained in the technical documentation is necessary to check compliance with the Annex III essential requirements, it must be made available upon a reasoned request.

Applies when
All manufacturers and anyone treated as manufacturer for substantial modifications; importers must verify that the manufacturer has drawn up the technical documentation and can produce it for 10 years.
Applies from: 2027-01-20
Evidence to retain
  • · Complete Annex IV Part A technical file (general drawings, control circuit diagrams, calculations and test results)
  • · List of harmonised standards applied, with clause-level identification where only partly applied
  • · Configuration management records for software and model versions
  • · Escrow and controlled-disclosure procedure for source code / programming logic, including confidentiality arrangements
  • · Named custodian and storage location for the 10-year retention

Estimated first-time effort: 15–45 person-days (estimate, not a commitment)

Draw up the EU declaration of conformity and affix the CE marking, including digital availability

Severity HighArt. 10(2), 10(8), 21, 23, 24;Annex V Part A

After conformity assessment, draw up the EU declaration of conformity under Article 21 and Annex V Part A and affix the CE marking under Articles 23 and 24. The machinery must be accompanied by the declaration, or the instructions must give the internet address or machine-readable code where it can be accessed. A digital declaration must stay accessible online for the expected lifetime and in any event for at least 10 years from placing on the market or putting into service.

Applies when
Manufacturers; authorised representatives keep the declaration within their mandate; importers and distributors must check that the CE marking and accompanying documents are present.
Applies from: 2027-01-20
Evidence to retain
  • · EU declaration of conformity in the Annex V Part A format, citing the Regulation and the notified body number
  • · Check record for CE marking placement and visibility
  • · Hosting page and availability monitoring record for the digital declaration
  • · Authorisation of the signatory of the declaration

Estimated first-time effort: 3–10 person-days (estimate, not a commitment)

Put in place an EU-established responsible economic operator and an authorised representative

Severity HighArt. 10(6), 12, 13;Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 Art. 4(3)

Products within the scope are subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, so they may only be placed on the market if an economic operator established in the Union is responsible for the tasks in Article 4(3) of that Regulation. Non-EU manufacturers should appoint an authorised representative by written mandate under Article 12 to keep the declaration of conformity and technical documentation and cooperate with authorities. The manufacturer must state its name and a contactable postal address and digital contact on the product, its packaging or an accompanying document.

Applies when
Chinese robot and machinery manufacturers without an EU legal entity, and EU distributors acting as importers.
Applies from: 2027-01-20
Evidence to retain
  • · Written mandate of the authorised representative specifying the tasks covered
  • · Identity and address of the EU responsible economic operator and a proof of its marking on the product or packaging
  • · Arrangement making the technical documentation and declaration retrievable inside the EU
  • · Named contact and response procedure for market surveillance authorities

Estimated first-time effort: 5–15 person-days (estimate, not a commitment)

Provide instructions for use and safety information, with digital and paper conditions

Severity MediumArt. 10(7);Annex III

Machinery must be accompanied by the instructions and information set out in Annex III. Digital instructions are allowed only if: the means of access is marked on the product, packaging or an accompanying document; the format lets the user print, download and store them on a device (including where they are embedded in the machine software); and they stay online for the expected lifetime and at least 10 years after placing on the market. On request at the time of purchase the manufacturer must supply paper instructions free of charge within one month, and machinery intended for or foreseeably used by non-professional users must carry essential safety information on paper. The language must be one easily understood by users as determined by the Member State concerned.

Applies when
All manufacturers supplying machinery to the EU, particularly smart robot products that deliver their manual through an app or the cloud.
Applies from: 2027-01-20
Evidence to retain
  • · Final instructions and safety information in each required language
  • · Proof that the access mark (QR code / URL) for digital instructions is applied on the product
  • · Hosting evidence that digital instructions are printable, downloadable and available online for 10 years
  • · Process and ticket records for supplying paper instructions on request within one month

Estimated first-time effort: 8–25 person-days (estimate, not a commitment)

Identify substantial modifications and take on manufacturer obligations, including for OTA and model updates

Severity HighArt. 18;Art. 25(2)–(4)

A natural or legal person carrying out a substantial modification is deemed to be the manufacturer and takes on all Article 10 obligations, must declare conformity on its sole responsibility for the affected machinery and must reapply the relevant conformity assessment procedure under Article 25(2), (3) or (4). Companies need a documented test for which remote updates, added functions or safety-related model replacements amount to a substantial modification. A non-professional user modifying their own machinery for their own use is not deemed the manufacturer.

Applies when
Chinese robot vendors and system integrators that deliver OTA upgrades, feature subscriptions, retraining of safety-related models or line retrofits for EU customers, and EU-side integrators performing the modification.
Applies from: 2027-01-20
Evidence to retain
  • · Change classification criteria and the per-change determination of whether a substantial modification occurs
  • · Re-run risk assessment and delta analysis for the affected machinery
  • · Post-modification conformity assessment records and the new EU declaration of conformity
  • · Customer notification and on-site acceptance records

Estimated first-time effort: 10–30 person-days (estimate, not a commitment)

Penalties

Article 50 leaves penalties to Member States, which must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and may include criminal penalties for serious infringements; Member States must notify the Commission by 20 October 2026 (the corrected date). The Regulation sets no harmonised ceiling, so exposure must be assessed under the national law of each target Member State.

Known uncertainty

The list of harmonised standards under this Regulation is still being built: per CEN member body catalogues, EN ISO 10218-1/-2:2025 carry no linked directive or regulation, so until harmonised standards are cited in the Official Journal, applying the new robot safety editions does not by itself confer presumption of conformity. National penalties must be notified by 20 October 2026, so country-level amounts can only be fixed after that. Every date in this entry is taken from the consolidated text including the corrigendum at OJ L 169, 4.7.2023; any secondary material still stating "applies in full from 14 January 2027" is copying the uncorrected original OJ text, and 20 January 2027 governs. The delegated acts that Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 requires to be added to Annex III had not been adopted as at the review date, so their content cannot be recorded in advance.

Sources (4)

Content as of 2026-09-12 · corpus 2026.09|Compiled from public official sources with links and review dates for compliance decision support. Rules change; have licensed professionals review before external disclosure, regulatory filing or contractual commitments.

Related regulations

GDPR · PIPL · CCPA control mapping
Traceable AI · cited when sourced
ISO 27001 alignment in progress
WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility target
EU Machinery Regulation · Obligations & official sources | HaiWen HQ